Why Israel’s attack on Iranian consulate in Syria was a gamechanger (2024)

The large-scale attack by Iran on Israel may have passed with relatively little damage, but it marks a significant transformation in the conflict between the two enemies.

A war that has long been fought through proxies, assassinations and strikes away from Israeli soil – often in third countries – has spilled into the open.

While senior Israeli officials have framed this weekend’s Iranian attack as “revealing the true face” of Tehran, the reality is that the proximate cause was Israel’s misjudgment in its strike on an Iranian diplomatic compound in Syria that killed two senior Iranian generals, among others.

After years in which both sides operated within the framework of a largely undeclared set of “rules”, Israel – as analysts have pointed out – bulldozed through every red line to attack a location that Tehran maintains was tantamount to attacking Iranian soil.

“Israel went too far in assassinating the Iranian general, probably, in a diplomatic location,” said Yagil Levy, a professor of military sociology at the Open University of Israel.

“Israel is led by the availability of its weapons systems. And whenever the country or the leadership feels that they have a good intelligence, a good opportunity and available weaponry systems that can do the job, Israel strikes,” he added.

“Israel doesn’t have a really strategic approach … the attempt to identify the [connections] between specific military actions and expected benefits is not in the repertoire of the Israeli leadership.”

And while much is made of Israel’s military strategy of deterrence, it is a principle no less strongly internalised in Iran, despite its years of trying to avoid direct confrontation.

Israeli commentators have framed the failure of the Iranian attack to do much damage as a defeat for Tehran and a victory for Israel, suggesting retaliation is inevitable following the first declared attack on Israeli soil by a foreign state since 1991, when Iraq fired missiles.

Iran missile and drone attack on Israel – what we know so farRead more

The reality is that the fact Iran attacked at all, while Israel is fighting against Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah on its northern border, is a significant strategic and policy failure that threatens to stretch already depleted military resources while inviting a widening conflict.

Although some have speculated that the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, agreed to the Israeli strike on Damascus deliberately to prompt exactly this widening crisis, what seems far more likely is that Israel misjudged it in a similar way to its miscalculations in the run-up to 7 October, when it fatally misread Hamas’s offensive posture.

The retired general Tamir Hayman, a former head of military intelligence and now managing director of the Institute for National Security Studies thinktank, said Netanyahu had handled the relationship with the US badly but ruled out a political motivation for the strike.

“I know how the system works, and I know probably how those strikes were planned and conducted and how, what elements of timing were needed,” he said. “I think that’s what stands behind the timing, not political [manipulation] but operational tactical opportunity.”

While Israel has been actively pursuing a policy of degrading the threat posed by Iran and its allies post-7 October, it appears also to have calculated that the policy could be achieved without a direct confrontation with Tehran.

After years of undeclared airstrikes in Syria, including against people closely associated with Iran, and six months of cross-border exchanges with Hezbollah in Lebanon, Israel had assumed wrongly that Tehran would not respond with a direct attack on Israeli soil.

Instead, the Damascus attack has placed Tehran and its leadership in what some have described as a “strategic conundrum”.

Having encouraged key allies in the “axis of resistance” – including Hezbollah, Yemen’s Houthis and pro-Iranian militias in Iraq – to launch their own attacks in support of Hamas in Gaza, the strike on Damascus became a test of credibility for Iran, both domestically for the regime and in the wider region.

“The attack on Damascus was the straw that broke the camel’s back,” said Sanam Vakil, the director of the Middle East and North Africa programme at the Chatham House thinktank, adding that the Iranian strikes were “unprecedented” and that Israel had likely failed to anticipate that Iran would respond in this way.

“It came on the back of so many other Israeli attacks that claimed lives in the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps and alongside the breach of the Vienna convention in attacking a diplomatic [site].

“I think Iran’s calculation was that if didn’t respond, Israel will keep trying to push back and degrade the axis of resistance across the region. This was about reinforcing its red lines and some measure of deterrence.”

Fate of Middle East hangs in the balance as Israel mulls its next steps Read more

The pressing risk now for Israel and the US in the hours and days ahead is that – as six months of war in Gaza and Lebanon have already demonstrated – the contagion of the current conflict continues to spill relentlessly beyond its boundaries.

Washington had poured diplomatic efforts into preventing escalation in recent months and, despite firm military support for Israel, is certain to be pushing Netanyahu to moderate any Israeli response. But the attack on Damascus – which the US was quick to say it had not been informed about – was a reminder of President Joe Biden’s limited leverage in Israel, despite the country’s reliance on US military support.

While it was highly significant that Jordan joined the effort to shoot down incoming Iranian munitions, the broadening scope of the conflict presses on lines of fracture, not least in Iraq.

The decision, almost certainly coordinated between Hezbollah and Tehran, for the Lebanese Shia group not to deploy its huge arsenal of heavy rockets during the Iranian attack also suggests that for now at least there is a small window of opportunity to stop the conflict deepening further still.

The burning question is whether, as Vakil suggests, Israel will feel content to portray its defence against Iran’s attack as a “success” in and of itself or whether it will risk striking back at Iran and further escalating the war.

“Iran’s retaliation was choreographed and telegraphed,” wrote HA Hellyer, a Middle East expert and senior fellow at the Royal United Services Institute, on X in the immediate aftermath of Iran’s attack.

“[There was] almost zero chance it was going to inflict damage on Israel with that level of warning. The point was to make a scene, and it did that. Iran’s payoff? Reputational advancement as ‘resistance’ internationally.

“We need de-escalation, and it’s imperative [Washington] DC convinces Tel Aviv of its determination not to be drawn into an offensive war with Iran. Netanyahu has been expressing his desire for one for a long time, but will hold back if he is sure the US won’t stand alongside.”

Why Israel’s attack on Iranian consulate in Syria was a gamechanger (2024)


Did Israel bomb the Iranian consulate? ›

Why Israel's attack on Iranian consulate in Syria was a gamechanger. The large-scale attack by Iran on Israel may have passed with relatively little damage, but it marks a significant transformation in the conflict between the two enemies.

Why does Israel want to attack Iran? ›

Several senior IRGC commanders have been killed in air strikes in Syria in recent months. The IRGC channels arms and equipment, including high precision missiles, through Syria to Hezbollah. Israel is trying to stop these deliveries, as well as seeking to prevent Iran from strengthening its military presence in Syria.

What is the issue between Israel and Iran? ›

Concurrently, starting in 2010, a shadow war emerged between Iran and Israel over Israel's efforts to hinder Iran's nuclear program and military buildup through espionage, targeted assassinations, sabotage, and cyberattacks.

What is the conflict between Syria and Israel? ›

Syria has been an active belligerent, with periodic ceasefires and use of proxies, against Israel ever since May 1948, when the Syrian army captured territory from the newly established State of Israel north and south of the Sea of Galilee.

What did Israel bomb in Iran? ›

Satellite photos taken Monday suggest an apparent Israeli retaliatory strike targeting Iran's central city of Isfahan hit a radar system for a Russian-made air defense battery, contradicting repeated denials by officials in Tehran of any damage in the assault.

Did Israel help Iran in war? ›

During the war, Israel was one of the main suppliers of military equipment to Iran. Israel also provided military instructors during the war, and in turn received Iranian intelligence that helped it carry out Operation Opera against Iraq's Osirak nuclear reactor.

Is Iran an ally to Israel? ›

Since 1985, Iran and Israel have been engaged in an ongoing proxy conflict that has greatly affected the geopolitics of the Middle East, and has included direct military confrontations between Iranian and Israeli organizations, such as in the 2006 Lebanon War.

Is Iran Sunni or Shia? ›

According to The World Factbook of the CIA, between 90-95% of Iran's Muslim are Shia, and another 5-10% are Sunni, the American Iranian Council, citing the Islamic Republic estimates, gives the Sunni percentage at between 7% and 10%. (Almost all of Iran's Shia follow the Twelver branch).

What is the conflict between Israel and Gaza? ›

Israel's unilateral disengagement

Palestinian militants have targeted a number of military bases and civilian towns in Southern Israel. Since 2001, Palestinian militants have launched thousands of rocket and mortar attacks on Israel from the Gaza Strip, killing, injuring and traumatizing Israeli civilians.

Why is Israel bombing Syria? ›

The attacks have only intensified since 2017 – almost becoming a weekly occurrence – to target rising Iranian and Hezbollah presence and influence in Syria.

Does Russia support Israel? ›

Russia supports two-state solution for Israeli–Palestinian conflict and has relations with several Palestinian political parties. Russia does not consider Hamas as a terrorist organization and continues to diplomatically negotiate with them.

Is Syria part of Israel in the Bible? ›

According to Jewish religious law (halakha), some laws only apply to Jews living in the Land of Israel and some areas in Jordan, Lebanon, and Syria (which are thought to be part of biblical Israel).

When did Israel bomb the Iran reactor? ›

These conclusions have implications for the Bush Doctrine, as the lack of success in 1981 casts doubt on the possible success of future attacks against nuclear programs. On June 7, 1981, eight Israeli F-16s attacked Osiraq, destroying the larger 70-MW reactor before it went operational.

Has Iran ever attacked Israel in the past? ›

The 13 April action was Iran's first direct attack on Israel since the Islamic Republic of Iran was established in 1979.

When did Iran strike Israel? ›

Several countries in the Middle East preemptively closed their airspace a few hours prior to Iran launching a standoff attack against Israel around midnight on 13 April.

When was the US embassy in Iran attacked? ›

Beginning in the fall of 1978, the U.S. embassy in Tehrān had been the scene of frequent demonstrations by Iranians who opposed the American presence in the country, and on February 14, 1979, about a month after the shah had fled Iran, the embassy was attacked and briefly occupied.


Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Laurine Ryan

Last Updated:

Views: 6678

Rating: 4.7 / 5 (77 voted)

Reviews: 92% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Laurine Ryan

Birthday: 1994-12-23

Address: Suite 751 871 Lissette Throughway, West Kittie, NH 41603

Phone: +2366831109631

Job: Sales Producer

Hobby: Creative writing, Motor sports, Do it yourself, Skateboarding, Coffee roasting, Calligraphy, Stand-up comedy

Introduction: My name is Laurine Ryan, I am a adorable, fair, graceful, spotless, gorgeous, homely, cooperative person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.