Download This Paper
Open PDF in Browser
Add Paper to My Library
Permalink
Using these links will ensure access to this page indefinitely
Copy URL
Copy DOI
51 Arizona State Law Journal 505 (2019)
47 PagesPosted: 11 Apr 2019Last revised: 13 Feb 2020
See all articles by Shawn Fields
Shawn Fields
Campbell University - Norman Adrian Wiggins School of Law
Date Written: December 14, 2018
Abstract
Arizona is widely recognized as the most permissive state in the country for public weapons possession. In 2010, then-Governor Jan Brewer famously removed all permitting requirements for public concealed carry of firearms, making Arizona only the third “constitutional carry” state in the nation. Also in 2010, and to much less fanfare, Arizona became the first state to prohibit local governments from enacting any regulations restricting the sale or possession of knives of any kind, including swords, maces, and other exotic blades. Today, Arizona remains the only state in the country with virtually no restrictions on the public concealed carry of any type of bladed weapon. In part owing to this deregulatory environment, as many as twelve percent of all Arizonans report publicly carrying a concealed deadly weapon on their person or in their vehicle.
But these laws have also created confusion for Arizona police officers charged with protecting the public. For over a century, Arizona officers could justifiably initiate an investigatory stop of a publicly armed individual based on little more than a reasonable suspicion that such possession was unlawful. But in a state where a significant percentage of the population lawfully possesses weapons in public, Arizona police must now discern which lethal weapons carriers are law abiding citizens and which ones pose true criminal threats to the public. Increasing the confusion for Arizona law enforcement, the Ninth Circuit and Arizona Supreme Court have recently authored conflicting opinions regarding whether a lawfully stopped individual can be frisked solely because he is armed or whether he must also give the officer reasonable suspicion that he is “presently dangerous.”
This Article examines three distinct aspects of Arizona law and policy as it relates to this growing confusion. First, it challenges the efficacy and constitutionality of Arizona’s “duty to inform” law, which seeks to clarify this reasonable suspicion quandary by requiring concealed weapons possessors to affirmatively disclose the presence of weapons to police officers when asked. As a matter of federal constitutional law, officers can only require citizens to cooperate with inquiries if reasonable suspicion already existed to justify the stop. In contrast, by requiring citizens to voluntarily disclose information to officers, “duty to inform” laws arguably place these encounters with law enforcement outside the traditional Terry v. Ohio stop context, thus rendering the encounter consensual and failing to solve the reasonable suspicion issue.
Second, the Article considers the competing case law in Arizona regarding the “armed and dangerous” prong of stop and frisk for lawful gun carriers. The Arizona Supreme Court in State v. Serna held that lawful weapons carriers cannot automatically be considered dangerous for purposes of a protective frisk. The Ninth Circuit, in United States v. Orman, held otherwise, and
focused on characteristics of gun ownership not explicitly considered by the Arizona Supreme Court. But both cases involved consensual encounters and not involuntary investigative stops. The Article surveys case law from other jurisdictions to offer a balanced approach to frisks of lawfully stopped, lawfully armed Arizonans.
Third, the Article highlights policy considerations relevant to resolving these competing perspectives, as well as the competing interests of Arizonans in exercising their statutory possession rights and of officers in protecting themselves and others when faced with a public weapon carrier. In doing so, the Article explores for the first time in scholarly literature what, if any, parallels can be drawn from the experience of officers stopping and frisking lawful gun carriers and officers stopping and frisking lawful knife carriers.
Keywords: Fourth Amendment, stop and frisk, concealed carry, firearms, knives, terry v. ohio
Suggested Citation:Suggested Citation
Fields, Shawn, Guns, Knives, and Swords: Policing a Heavily Armed Arizona (December 14, 2018). 51 Arizona State Law Journal 505 (2019), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3355937 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3355937
Shawn Fields (Contact Author)
Campbell University - Norman Adrian Wiggins School of Law ( email )
225 Hillsborough Street
Raleigh, NC 27603
United States
Download This Paper
Open PDF in Browser
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Place Job Opening
Paper statistics
Downloads
128
Abstract Views
1,107
Rank
405,099
23 References
PlumX Metrics
Related eJournals
-
Criminal Procedure eJournal
Follow
Criminal Procedure eJournal
Subscribe to this fee journal for more curated articles on this topic
FOLLOWERS
1,279
PAPERS
9,354
This Journal is curated by:
Paul H. Robinson at University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School
-
Follow
Law & Society: Public Law - Crime, Criminal Law, & Punishment eJournal
Subscribe to this fee journal for more curated articles on this topic
FOLLOWERS
857
PAPERS
17,941
This Journal is curated by:
Jessica Eaglin at Cornell Law School
-
Follow
Law & Society: Criminal Procedure eJournal
Subscribe to this fee journal for more curated articles on this topic
FOLLOWERS
792
PAPERS
7,830
This Journal is curated by:
Jeannine Bell at Indiana University Maurer School of Law
-
Follow
Political Institutions: Federalism & Sub-National Politics eJournal
Subscribe to this fee journal for more curated articles on this topic
FOLLOWERS
368
PAPERS
7,343
This Journal is curated by:
Thad Kousser at University of California, San Diego (UCSD) - Department of Political Science
-
Follow
Criminal Law, Courts & Procedure eJournal
Subscribe to this fee journal for more curated articles on this topic
FOLLOWERS
266
PAPERS
8,532
-
Law Enforcement eJournal
Follow
Law Enforcement eJournal
Subscribe to this fee journal for more curated articles on this topic
FOLLOWERS
209
PAPERS
2,756
-
Correlates of Crime eJournal
Follow
Correlates of Crime eJournal
Subscribe to this fee journal for more curated articles on this topic
FOLLOWERS
194
PAPERS
2,467
Feedback
Feedback to SSRN
If you need immediate assistance, call 877-SSRNHelp (877 777 6435) in the United States, or +1 212 448 2500 outside of the United States, 8:30AM to 6:00PM U.S. Eastern, Monday - Friday.